• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. A hint from the technical side for drafting contingencies

A hint from the technical side for drafting contingencies

When they’re reviewing a study, some reviewers (and some of the IRB office staff, too!) like to open a separate document in Word or some other program to draft contingencies as they work through a study. Then, they copy and paste those contingencies into CLARA when they wrap up their review. There’s nothing inherently wrong with doing things that way, and that method can, in fact, make it easier for you to see the full CLARA window as you’re drafting contingencies, because the contingency box won’t pop up and obscure whatever it is you’re writing the contingency about.

BUT (and you knew a “but” was coming, didn’t you?) one little technical issue emerges when contingencies are cut and pasted from another program — line breaks that put a ton of space into the middle of contingencies.

Each <br/> symbol you see translates to a line break. That means a blank line will appear in the final IRB letter for each <br/> symbol, unless someone goes in and manually removes them. Also, every time someone after you opens the contingency to review or edit it, CLARA will add another line break. The end result is a final letter with huge blank spaces in it.

This spacing issue results from the way CLARA reads the various hidden formatting codes that appear in text copied from another program. There are a couple of ways to avoid this spacing issue. First, and probably the easiest, is to draft contingencies directly into CLARA, rather than into another program first and then cutting and pasting. Having the contingency box pop up in front of your CLARA window can take a bit of getting used to, but it’s workable, particularly if your screen is large enough to accommodate multiple open windows simultaneously. Alternatively, if you cut and paste from a separate program, please take a minute to manually delete all the <br/> symbols. You may need to close and reopen the contingency to be able to see them. That will save a bit of time for the person who finalizes the contingency before sending it out.

 

 

Posted by Edith Paal on August 19, 2015

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2025 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences