• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Currently open studies — The process for switching to the RCR (and whether switching is worth it or not)

Currently open studies — The process for switching to the RCR (and whether switching is worth it or not)

The Revised Common Rule (RCR), slated to take effect Monday, January 21, gives studies open prior to that date the choice of either staying with the current Common Rule regulations or transitioning to the RCR.

The UAMS IRB will allow investigators to request consideration to change to the RCR with their next continuing review. The CR form will include a question at the top asking if you’d like this study to be considered for the switch to the RCR. Note that regardless of your answer, you’ll go on to complete the full CR form. (Yes, everybody will get one more complete CR, even if they do decide to switch their study to the RCR and the switch means they won’t have to submit full CRs in the future.)

If you check “yes” to the “do you want to switch” query, please note that the transition is not automatic. The IRB office will contact you regarding what the transition will entail and see if it is worth pursuing. Depending on where in its life cycle a study is, and/or what kind of study it is, it may be simpler to stay under the old rule.

Some things to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to switch are below. Most of this text will also be included as help text with the CLARA question regarding transitioning. Please review it before deciding which box to check:

The 2019 revisions generally decrease the oversight and regulatory burdens of minimal-risk studies. However, the revised rules/policies do have additional requirements related to informed consent. PI may wish to consider transitioning the following types of studies:

  • Those currently reviewed using expedited procedures and that either do not have any written consent documents or that use written consent materials that the study team is willing to revise.
  • Current expedited-review-status studies that would qualify for exempt status review under the RCR. In particular, prospective chart reviews and studies involving “benign behavioral interventions” may qualify for exempt status review in the future.
  • Full-board review studies NOT subject to FDA oversight that have reached the data analysis or long-term follow-up (collecting only information created through standard clinical care) phase only.

Note: FDA-regulated studies CANNOT be transitioned to the 2019 rule, as they are subject to additional regulations that have not changed. 

 

Posted by Edith Paal on January 15, 2019

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences