• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Abbreviations and Acronyms
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Emergency Use
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Is much biomedical research nothing more than bad science?

Is much biomedical research nothing more than bad science?

A science reporter for National Public Radio weighs in on the quality of biomedical research in a new book out this month.

The title of Richard Harris’ book, “Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hopes, and Wastes Billions,” does little to instill confidence in those of us who make our careers in, or volunteer our time reviewing, medical research. But it might be an interesting addition to the literature on how biomedical research is viewed by experts in the field and the public at large.

We here at IRB Blog Central have not yet read this title, but we are intrigued by some of the reviews of it we found online:

From PBS: Why bad science is plaguing health research — and how to fix it

Kirkus Reviews describes the book as an “easy-reading but hard-hitting expose of a dysfunctional biomedical research system” that “is sure to stir controversy and arouse ire among those who feel their ox is being gored.”

From NPR, which includes a link to an audio interview with the author.

And, as an aside, a Stanford statistician has also done some work highlighting what he thinks are deficiencies in many research publications. An IRB Blog Central editor heard him speak at a conference once, and found his arguments interesting.

Disclaimer: We have no competing interest in recommending this title. Zero, zip, nada. Our interest in this book and its sales is limited to ordering a copy as soon as we get a chance.

 

Posted by Edith Paal on April 17, 2017

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement

© 2025 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences