• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Restricting the use of genetic data

Restricting the use of genetic data

On the one hand, human genetic data has great promise for use in research. The human genome, and small portions thereof, show great potential in helping us answer questions related to human health, including developing treatments for genetic conditions.

On the other hand, the ethics of using genetic data keeps researchers, IRBs, ethicists, and others awake at night while trying to develop appropriate guidelines for the use and sharing of these data. As of now, the average nonscientist could not readily reidentify an individual from genetic data available in publicly available datasets. But — what if the person with access to such a dataset has access to specialized technology allowing reidentification, or allowing that dataset to be combined with other publicly available information to reidentify individuals? And can we expect such technology to become more readily available in the future (short answer: yes.).

At the IRB, we frequently encounter studies that create or use genetic data. We do our best to ensure that relevant regulatory requirements and guidances are met for the use of these data and that subjects are informed to the extent possible of what will happen to their data. However, privately created databases, such as those created by services that do genetic testing of individuals for genealogy purposes, may  not subject to the same kind of ethical oversight that research datasets are. In fact, law enforcement has used these databases to help solve crimes. Now two states have taken steps to restrict law enforcement’s ability to access this kind of data.

This availability of personal genetic data creates a delicate balancing act for the IRB and human subject research ethicists. On the one hand, we want to ensure data confidentiality is protected to the extent possible, and feasible. On the other hand, we know that many of our research subjects, or their family members, may have contributed to these publicly available databases, and that they may welcome to the opportunity to participate in research related to genetic conditions. The IRB’s requirement that protocols carefully and thoroughly describe the creation, use, and possible sharing of genetic data is one part of how we ensure we meet our regulatory requirements and protect human subjects to the extent possible, and feasible.

 

Posted by Edith Paal on June 1, 2021

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences