• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Study: Informed consent documents remain problematic

Study: Informed consent documents remain problematic

The thought of a 17,000-word-long consent form causes our eyes to glaze over — that’s more than 30 pages of single-spaced text. But apparently such a thing exists, according to a recent study about consent forms from IDE studies, accepted for publication in the journal Contemporary Clinical Trials and reported on at the Regulatory Affairs Professionals Society web page.

The study, done by staffers at the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, examined 399 consent forms from 2015 and 2016. It found the consent forms were written, on average, at a 10th-grade reading level, and ranged from 2 to 37 pages in length.

Click on the link to read the full RAPS article. The article includes a link to the original manuscript. As you read it, please think about your own consent processes, including the forms or other visual or printed materials you use in them. Yes, certain elements must be addressed in the consent process, by regulation and policy. However, you have wide latitude in how to address them. For starters, we have a plain language informed consent template (see the RCR-compliant plain language template here) developed by the UAMS Center for Health Literacy that’s intended to convey written information in understandable terms. Also, the UAMS IRB encourages researchers to think creatively about the entire consent process. Page after page of printed text is only one way of transmitting information, and perhaps not the best way for your study population. Would pictures, tables, brochures work for your target audience? Many years ago, the IRB reviewed a consent form that included a drawing showing where in the body an investigational device would be implanted. The picture helped the study team avoid having to use a whole lot of words to describe device placement. The reviewers loved it. We haven’t seen one like that since, but we’re definitely open to that sort of thing.

Posted by Edith Paal on August 28, 2019

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences