• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Two simple fixes that will get things through the IRB faster

Two simple fixes that will get things through the IRB faster

We at the IRB really hate to have to send submissions back due to minor little slip-ups, but we’ve been seeing a few little problems crop up lately. Since we’re a little short-staffed, we don’t really have time to sort through submissions that need some minor fixes to get them ready to review, so we’ve had to send back contingencies on the following items. Please keep an eye out for these when making CLARA submissions:

— Make sure tracked-changes documents show ALL changes from the previous version, including deletions. By far the easiest way to do this is by using the “track changes” option in Word. Remember, unlike our previous online submission system, ARIA, our current system, CLARA, allows you to upload documents created in Word. In fact, we recommend using Word to create study documents whenever possible for the reason that it vastly simplifies tracking of revisions. Sometimes people try to manually highlight or underline changes in revised documents. This method often causes people to miss changes, and also doesn’t allow one to note deletions. So please use the “Track Changes” function instead.

— Stacking documents correctly. A full explanation of stacking documents correctly can be found via the “Help” link in CLARA (click “managing documents” under the “Protocols” heading. In a nutshell, all clean versions of a particular document should be in a single stack in CLARA, with the most recent iteration on top. All tracked-changes versions should be stacked in their own stack, again with the most recent on top. The most common stacking problem we find is clean and stacked-changes versions piled atop each other in a single stack. So be sure to double-check before signing and submitting that all documents stacks contain only clean, or only tracked-changes, documents. If they’re mixed, there’s a problem that will need to be fixed.

 

Posted by Edith Paal on August 2, 2017

Filed Under: Research News

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2025 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences