• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Two sure-fire ways to slow down your review and approval

Two sure-fire ways to slow down your review and approval

We’ve noticed some issues that are almost guaranteed to get you a minor prereview contingency from the IRB office these days. We thought we’d address them on our blog so you can minimize approval delays:

–In new submissions: Failing to request the correct kind of waiver relating to the consent process and documentation. Consent process waivers and consent documentation waivers are two different types of waivers. They each have separate requirements and the IRB must consider different elements for each. To recap, a consent process waiver is appropriate for studies in which no consent process will occur at all, such as a retroactive chart review study. In general, the subjects will never know they or their info were part of a research study. A consent documentation waiver means that some sort of consent process will occur, but you will not collect signed informed consent forms. Subjects will know they are participating in a research study, and may be given written information about the study, but won’t sign consent forms. We see this in survey and focus group research a lot. More information about these two types of waivers and how to request them in CLARA and address them in your protocol can be found in this IRB Blog item and also in IRB Policy 15.3.

–In new submissions and revisions: Incorrect document stacking in CLARA. Remember that when you revise a document, the new clean version should go on top of the old clean version, and the new tracked-changes version should go on top of any previous tracked-changes version. So when you’re done, and you’ve stacked correctly, you’ll have two different stacks in CLARA for the same type of document — one of only clean protocols, and one of only tracked-changes protocols, for example, with the most recent of each on top. Clean and tracked-changes copies should never both be in the same stack. You can get detailed instructions for stacking documents in CLARA. Look for the “help” link in the black bar at the top, and then, under the “Protocols” heading, find the “Managing Documents” link.

Other tips that may speed your submission through the review process are available here.

Posted by Edith Paal on March 20, 2018

Filed Under: Research News

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2025 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences