• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Abbreviations and Acronyms
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Author: Edith Paal
  5. Page 4

Edith Paal

FDA guidance on charging for investigational drugs

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just released a Q&A formatted guidance about charging for investigational drugs under an IND. While the guidance is geared toward industry, it contains helpful information for investigators who sponsor their own INDs, and for study teams and HRPP staff involved in drafting consent forms and creating budgets. We […]

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

FDA to allow consent waivers

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made it official – it will allow waivers/alterations of informed consent processes for certain studies, according to a new rule to take effect this month. You may recall the FDA issued a guidance in 2017 saying it would not object to consent waivers/alterations on certain minimal risk studies. […]

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

CLARA form’s HIPAA section updates

The CLARA new submission form’s HIPAA section has been updated to make it easier to describe specific protected health information (PHI) elements to be accessed/recorded/used in research. Instead of asking you to describe “PHI data elements,” the first question now asks you to describe “specific health information that will be used/recorded for the research.” We […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members, Research News, Using CLARA

Revised IRB policies posted

The IRB, in consultation with the Human Research Protection Program Advisory Committee, has completed its annual review and updating of IRB policies. Revised policies are now available here. A summary of revisions is available here. Need to see an older policy version? The policy archives are also on our webpage.

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

Biologic use draws scrutiny

Concerns about a biologic product used in procedures at a New York hospital prompted a complaint by a researcher against his supervisor, according to a recent New York Times article. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had issued a warning letter to the product manufacturer, citing concerns about the manufacturing process and also stating the […]

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

GDPR and SPIND information

In a field full of acronyms, here are two more. GDPR refers to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation and SPIND refers to Single Patient Investigational New Drug application, which is a type of expanded access program for investigational drugs. We now have available some good resources about the GDPR and SPINDs. The GDPR […]

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

HSP education option for community partners

Investigators are increasingly collaborating with community partners in research projects. These community partners typically don’t have much research experience and don’t work at research institutions, meaning they may not have too much human subject protection background. However, they play a vital role in making research opportunities available to populations around Arkansas. The UAMS IRB and […]

Filed Under: Blog, Research News

FDA finalizes informed consent guidance

The federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has released the final version of its guidance on informed consent. This guidance finalizes a draft guidance that dates to 2014. This guidance addresses a lot of those random little questions that we don’t often think about. For example, page 27 indicates that when a subject provides consent […]

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

A proposal regarding IRBs

Are IRBs inherently conflicted in their work? Whether they’re part of an institution or a private, independent IRB, they have stakeholders who have an interest in IRB review outcomes, and who potentially can exert pressure on IRBs, according to a recent article in Nature Medicine. Authors Jonathan M. Green and Stephen Rosenfeld, who both have […]

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

Clinical Research and Abortion Restrictions

A recent publication in the journal Science claims that changing laws related to abortion availability can have implications for the review and conduct of some clinical research. Click on the link to read these authors’ thoughts on the topic and some of their suggestions for addressing these issues.

Filed Under: Blog, Institutional Review Board Members, Research News

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 71
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement

© 2025 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences