• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Blog
  5. Page 27

Blog

NIH cracking down on bad behavior

Getting NIH funding is cool. Losing that funding due to bad behavior, not so much. NIH reports it looked at more than two dozen allegations of sexual harassment last year involving scientists whose work it supports, with 14 investigators who had received NIH grants being replaced, according to an article in Nature. Another 21 PIs […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Will the FDA look more closely at some devices?

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may be on a trend to look more closely at some medical devices, according to a recent NPR report. Problems related to what FDA calls 510(k) devices are prompting this change, per the article. 510(k) devices are those the manufacturer has shown are “substantially equivalent” to a legally marketed […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Reminder to check for the person obtaining consent signature line on consent forms

Here’s a reminder the UAMS IRB has NOT dropped its requirement that the person obtaining consent sign the consent form when a written form is used. An early iteration of the RCR-compliance plain language consent form on our website accidentally omitted the person obtaining consent signature line. We apologize for that error, and have since […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Reminders about transitioning to the Revised Common Rule

When you hear that one impetus behind OHRP’s decision to revise the Common Rule was to minimize regulatory burdens where appropriate, you may be tempted to switch your studies initially reviewed under the old rule to the Revised Common Rule (RCR). You have the chance to do so at your next continuing review. But, before […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Questions about a study at the San Diego VA

We’ll just put this out there without much comment, other than to say this is the kind of situation human research protection programs try to avoid even the appearance of.    

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Kudos to two of our IRB reviewers

You’d think we keep our IRB reviewers so busy that they’d barely have time to manage the whole rest of their careers. But you’d be wrong, as shown by two of our reviewers. Congratulations to Leah Eisenberg, J.D., M.A., HEC-C, on becoming one of the first bioethics experts in the United States to be certified […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

A small but noteworthy change in the informed consent regulation

How significant can a two-word change be? In the case of a small revision to the informed consent regulations in the Revised Common Rule (RCR), two little words may spur investigators and IRB reviewers to think about the informed consent process more expansively. The change, as noted in a recent AAHRPP webinar on understanding in […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Posting clinical trial consent forms, as required by the RCR

The Revised Common Rule (RCR) requires federally conducted or supported clinical trials to post a consent form on a publicly available federal website. Because this requirement is new, we’re still figuring out how it works in practice. Here’s some information that may help. First, the RCR’s definition of a clinical trial is: A research study […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

The context in which we consider subject privacy and data confidentiality

Everywhere we go, we leave a trail of data behind. Every scan of our grocery store loyalty card, every time our phone tracks our location or activity level, every time we enter something into our diet tracker, or an online search engine, or a social media account, every time someone files a medical claim to […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

The TWO reasons to start with a fresh template every time

We know the temptation to pick up an old study’s documents and try to revise them to fit a new study is great. We also fervently hope you resist it each and every time you face it. Here are ALL of the reasons to NOT try to adapt an old document to a new study. […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 74
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences