• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Blog
  5. Page 53

Blog

We’ll be so glad when the revised Common Rule is finally published…

…because then all the brouahaha about the revisions will finally settle down. Ha. We are such kidders. You may recall mention in this blog of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which the Office for Human Research Protections released to announce that it is considering revising the Common Rule. Proposed changes include requiring broad consent for future use […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Simplify your consent form, part 4 (and maybe prevent yourself some hassle too)

The requirement to list the planned number of study subjects in a consent form is nothing new. It’s described in 45 CFR 46.116(b)(6) (applicable to all human subject research done at UAMS), 21 CFR 50.25(b)(6) (applicable to FDA-regulated studies), and UAMS IRB Policy 15.1. Even though this is not the most complicated consent form element, is […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

“Retrospective Chart Review” defined

When we see a study submission that describes a project as a retrospective chart review, the IRB needs to make sure the project is truly retrospective. A retrospective chart review involves looking at information that already exists at the time of IRB approval. We may ask that you specify an end date to document that all the […]

Filed Under: Research News

New blog quiz available — earn 0.5 CRS credits

The next IRB blog quiz is available at learnondemand.org. To find the quiz, go to the learnondemand.org home page and type “IRB” in the search box at upper right. Remember, these quizzes allow you to earn 0.5 Certified Research Specialist elective hours each – up to 2 hours per year – at the time and place […]

Filed Under: Research News

My, what great big settlements you have, HIPAA regulation!

A stolen laptop containing research subjects’ personal information will cost one medical research institute close to $4 million dollars to settle the resulting HIPAA case, according to the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the federal agency that enforces HIPAA. The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in New York has agreed to pay $3.9 million to settle potential […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Another risk to using genetic information?

The issue of whether genetic information or material can be considered identifiable prompts a great deal of discussion among researchers and IRBs. On the one side are those who believe that nothing is more uniquely identifiable than an individual’s genetic information. On the other are those who say that genetic information by itself cannot readily […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Simplifying consent forms, Chapter 3

Ensuring the right steps are taken to prevent pregnancy can be an important part of research subject safety, particularly for drug studies, as the effects of a research intervention on an embryo or fetus are often unknown. But what’s the best way to describe the requirement to avoid pregnancy in a consent form? Quorum Review […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

More research in the news

Research involving human  materials is again in the news at The New York Times. A recent news article about fetal tissue researchers highlights some of the nuances involved in this type of research, and not just the ethics of it. The article highlights issues related not just to sourcing of fetal material, but also to concerns relevant to the broader […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

The risks and benefits of research can be unpredictable

The decision to join a research study can have unpredictable long-term results. A man with autism who, at age 50, joined a study examining transcranial magnetic stimulation found the effects life-changing, in both positive and negative ways.

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Simplifying consent forms, Part 2

Many research studies involve multiple visits, with specific procedures to be carried out at each visit. Consent forms often describe this kind of research in visit-by-visit lists that include each procedure at every visit. This format can lead to a long consent form that includes a lot of repetition, if procedures will be repeated. We encourage […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 51
  • Page 52
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 74
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences