• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Blog
  5. Page 66

Blog

Track changes — use’em, and please make sure the clean and tracked changes versions match!

When submitting protocol and consent form revisions, the IRB asks that you submit clean and tracked-changes versions of revised documents. Microsoft Word makes it easy to create clean and tracked changes versions of items created in Word. Please note that your clean and tracked changes versions should exactly match each other, except for the tracking. […]

Filed Under: Research News

There’s usually still a consent process if you are waiving documentation of consent

When completing new submission forms, you’ll encounter a question that asks you to check the type of consent process(es) to be used in the research. The four response options are Assent; Parental Permission (Pediatric Consent); Informed Consent; and Requesting Waiver of Consent Process. We’ve seen some creative answers given to this question when PIs are […]

Filed Under: Research News

Hints for numbering study documents

All protocols, consent forms, HIPAA authorization forms, and other study documents subject to revision should include a version number and date on each page. Whenever you update a document, please remember to update the version number and date on each page to reflect the changes. Also, when submitting tracked changes versions of documents, please make […]

Filed Under: Research News

Subject Selection is Equitable — the third criterion for approval

The next installment in our review of the criteria for IRB approval of research … The third approval criterion reads, “Seletion of subjects is equitable.” This criterion is rooted in the Belmont Report’s principle of justice. Who ought to receive the benefits of research, and who should bear its burdens? In considering this criterion, IRB […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Earn CRS credit for an upcoming data security webinar

An upcoming webinar on data security will offer CRS elective credit. The UAMS Office of Research Compliance is to host the PRIM&R webinar “Data Security Incidents – the Role of IRBs and Information Security” on Thursday, February 26, from 12:00-1:30 p.m. in the Walton Auditorium on the 10th floor of the Cancer Institute. An overview of […]

Filed Under: Research News

TRI services available for the research community

The TRI Translational Research Services Center offers the following free protocol development services: We also offer other fee-based services which includes IRB submission assistance and ongoing regulatory maintenance services, research coordinator support and participant recruitment. To request any of the services offered by TRI, please submit your request to TRIServices@uams.edu.

Filed Under: Research News

Criteria for Approval, Continued — Risks, Benefits and the Second Criterion

As we work our way through a review of the criteria for approval, please keep in mind that these criteria should guide our study reviews and the drafting of contingencies sent back to study teams. The second criterion for approval is “Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, and the […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Study closure form options explained

The CLARA closure form has three options for the status of a study that you’re trying to close. The study must fit into one of these three categories to qualify for closure. “Study never initiated (sponsored studies only)” is appropriate for industry-sponsored trials that, for whatever reason, never got off the ground at this site. […]

Filed Under: Research News

The First Criterion for IRB Approval of Research — A Refresher

When participating in those lively, and sometimes lengthy, discussions at IRB meetings, it can be easy to forget that IRB approval is based on on just a handful of criteria. Upcoming IRB Members Blog items will provide a refresher of these criteria. These criteria should underpin all the contingencies the IRB sends back to investigators. […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

New submission form changes, plus some tips for completing the form

Those who pay close attention to these things (and we hope that’s all of you!) may have noticed some recent changes to the HIPAA section of the new submission form. The changes include rewording some queries to make it clearer that the form is asking you to indicate which specific PHI elements you are going […]

Filed Under: Research News

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 64
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Page 67
  • Page 68
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 74
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences