• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Author: Edith Paal
  5. Page 12

Edith Paal

What’s a protocol addendum, and how does it help?

Is your study team participating in a multi-site study in which each site will undergo separate IRB review? If so, take advantage of the option to submit a “local protocol addendum” to add detail about the main protocol the main site sends you. The IRB knows that asking for a correction or an addition to […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

A new approach to flexible review

Ever wondered how to make a grown IRB office staffer cry? Easy – send them a protocol submission that almost but not quite meets the criteria for expedited review. An example – protocols that involve multiple teeny tiny blood draws done over a short period of time. Expedited category 2a allows a reasonable amount of blood to […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

ORC wants to hear from you about education programs!

ORC, which has worked wonders over the past 18 months to keep the education offerings coming during a pandemic, is asking for feedback about the Certified Research Specialist (CRS) and Advanced Certified Research Specialist (ACRS) programs! Please click this link to take a short (10-minutes-max or so) anonymous survey about these two educational programs. ORC […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Updated IRB policies

Although  it wasn’t easy – some behind-the-scenes server switching caused the IRB’s web page to go a little kablooie – we finally were able to get some updated IRB policies posted. All of the current policies can be found on the IRB’s webpage. Retired policies are archived on the policy archive webpage. The most notable […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Considerations for eConsent

A recent blog entry on the Public Responsibility In Medicine & Research (PRIM&R) is a good reminder of some of the considerations associated with obtaining consent for research remotely. eConsent is becoming more common, both because of the growth of telemedicine in general, and also because of its ability to make research available across a […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Penn Medicine apologizes for prisoner research

A recent Philadelphia Inquirer article indicates the dean of Penn Medicine has apologized for the work of a longtime faculty member (now deceased) for conducting medical research on inmates at a Philadelphia prison. The research led by dermatologist Dr. Albert Kligman was done at Philadelphia’s Holmesburg Prison, where most of the inmates were Black. The […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Exempt research consent templates now available

We’ve been noticing, as we review studies that qualify for exempt status review, that sometimes it seems like the consent process is the longest and most daunting-to-subjects part of participation. We realized that we didn’t have any consent material templates geared for exempt status research readily available. At least that’s a problem we can solve […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Vitamin D study in children with asthma raises ethical concerns

The use of a placebo in a study assessing whether vitamin D supplements reduced the number of asthma attacks in kids with asthma raised some eyebrows in research ethics circles, according to a recent online publication in Science. Per the article, children with asthma and known to have low vitamin D levels were to receive either […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

A new, and vastly improved, HIPAA research authorization template is now available

Simplifying the language in our HIPAA research authorization template has been on the IRB’s to-do list for, oh, about 15 or so years now. We’re happy to report that, thanks to both a nudge from and the assistance of the UAMS Center for Health Literacy, we have a brand new, much more reader-friendly HIPAA authorization […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

A revised Human Research Protection Program Plan is now available

UAMS has updated its Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Plan, and the revised version is now posted on the IRB’s website. The HRPP plan describes the various institutional components that play a role in the ethical conduct of human subject research at UAMS. The most notable change to this iteration of the plan is the […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 72
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences