• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Author: Edith Paal
  5. Page 29

Edith Paal

Addendum to our earlier post about the famous food researcher resigning

You may recall our earlier blog post about well-known food researcher Brian Wansink resigning after questions were raised about his research. We recently came across a piece in the New Yorker about a previous Wansink-related kerfuffle. Messing with data is one thing. Messing with the “Joy of Cooking” cookbook, however, is just stirring up trouble. […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

FDA-regulated research, and the Revised Common Rule

The Food and Drug Administration has issued guidance related to FDA-regulated studies that are also subject to the Revised Common Rule.  As you may already know, the Revised Common Rule (RCR) is to take effect in January 2019 (the 22nd here, to be specific; the first workday after the rule’s implementation date). The RCR will […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Revised Common Rule: New informed consent elements

In addition to requiring a “concise and focused summary of key elements” in consent processes, the Revised Common Rule (RCR) makes a few other changes to consent elements. Under the RCR, the following statements must be included when applicable: —The subject’s biospecimens (even if identifiers are removed) may be used for commercial profit and whether […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

The “concise and focused” presentation of “key elements” in informed consent, continued

The more we learn about the Revised Common Rule’s (RCR) requirement that “informed consent begin with a concise and focused presentation of the key information … most likely to assist” in the decision whether or not to join a study, the more we realize that there’s still a lot more to learn, much of which […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Changes in AC/ACRI HIPAA requirements

As Arkansas Children’s and the Arkansas Children’s Research Institute continue the process of reworking their corporate structure, the IRB will notice some changes in some research-related documents. Arkansas Children’s has made a new HIPAA authorization template available for Arkansas Children’s researchers. You’ll notice at least two changes on the template. First, its format is closer […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

“Concise and Focused” consent form summary

One noticeable new aspect of the Revised Common Rule is the requirement to include a “concise and focused” presentation of key information that would help a subject decide whether or not to join a study in the consent process. Although guidance as to what form this summary should take is only trickling out, we have […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

The Revised Common Rule talk is still available

The Revised Common Rule (RCR), slated to be implemented Jan. 19, 2019, will be here before you know it. IRB staff recently gave a talk on the (RCR) changes most likely to affect research teams. For those who couldn’t attend, the talk was recorded, and will be rebroadcast in a webinar format at the following […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Study progress details greatly appreciated on Continuing Review forms

Continuing review forms include a query asking you to summarize study progress in a free-text response. Please use this space to provide a complete summary of the study’s status, including describing how many subjects have completed the study, what part of the study any that haven’t completed yet are in, whether any notable positive or negative issues […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Recording of the Revised Common Rule Overview presentation now available

If you couldn’t make it to the IRB’s October 30th talk about the changes coming with the Revised Common Rule, here are a few ways to catch up on what you missed. Feeling sociable? Attend one of the upcoming webinar replays: There will be two showings on Friday Nov. 9, Cancer Institute 10th floor, Room […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Reminder about IRB confidentiality

Please remember discussions that happen inside the IRB’s meeting room need to stay inside the meeting room. IRB determinations and contingencies are considered group decisions. Those decisions are relayed to the research team via correspondence through CLARA. Reviewers – If someone on a research team asks you for specifics about their project’s IRB review, please […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 72
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences