Despite a requirement to report clinical trial results, the number of studies actually reporting results on time remains painfully low, according to this recent New York Times article. Trial sponsor are to report findings within a year of collecting the most critical data, the author writes, a deadline that many miss. Read the entire article […]
Institutional Review Board Members
Reminders for our Institutional Review Board reviewers about policies, using Clinical Research Administration (CLARA), and other news. Feel free to click on this blog even if you aren’t on the Institutional Review Board. You may get some pointers about what the Institutional Review Board is looking for when it reviews your studies.
Adding a Site to Clara When the UAMS Institutional Review Board Is the Institutional Review Board of Record
So, you’ve got a great multisite study started, for which the UAMS Institutional Review Board will be the institutional review board of record. You’re ready to take the step of submitting site addition modification forms in Clinical Research Administration (CLARA) to add additional sites. We’ve recently updated our method for entering sites into CLARA. Rather […]
Ethical payment to subjects in human infection challenge studies
We were thrilled to stumble across this newly available, open-access, paper titled Promoting Ethical Payment in Human Infection Challenge Studies in The American Journal of Bioethics. The paper discusses the process to determine ethically defensible compensation levels for research subjects, with special emphasis on trials that involve intentionally exposing participants to infectious agents, such as the virus that […]
AAHRPP Resources for IRB Reviewers
The Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs, or AAHRPP, sets standards for human research protection programs (HRPPs). AAHRPP is our accrediting body, and its website has several resources that may help IRB reviewers in their review. Of particular note are AAHRPP’s tip sheets, which delve into detail about specific topics. We use […]
Tracking document changes
Since the IRB has started allowing the submission of only tracked-changes copies of revised documents, we’ve found that our reviews are a little easier, and CLARA document files are a little cleaner, for studies that only submit the tracked-changes copy. Therefore, the IRB now asks that you submit only a single copy of any revised documents, […]
What’s new in 2021 for the IRB
Happy New Year to all! Here’s our best guess as to what our IRB reviewers can look forward to in 2021. We’ll cover this information in our in-person education in January. Some of you will be selected to meet with our AAHRPP accreditation site visitors. We’re not quite sure when the site visit will take […]
IRB Reviewer Education Recap
Our plan was to make the slides from each monthly training session available on the IRB members blog, along with a little background information for each. Our reality, however, fell a little short of that goal. (Hey, we may have just found our 2021 New Year’s Resolution!) Below are the slides for education presentations we’ve […]
Wearables/apps in research, end user license agreements, and research – Considerations for researchers and IRBs
Digital data collection tools, such as small wearable devices (think FitBits or Apple Watches) and apps downloaded onto a subject’s phone, are becoming increasingly common in human subject research. Some projects are testing the products themselves, while others use them merely to collect research data. You know that giant document that you never actually read […]
HIPAA “Review Preparatory to Research” form to go online starting 12/14/20
Among the many blessings HIPAA has rained upon us (ahem) is a requirement pertaining to reviews preparatory to research. “Review preparatory to research” refers to accessing protected health information solely to prepare a research protocol before getting a signed HIPAA authorization or a HIPAA authorization waiver. A review preparatory to research can be done only […]
New policy for DoD-supported research
Additional agency-specific requirements apply to human subject research studies conducted or supported by the federal Department of Defense (DoD). Because we’re seeing a slight uptick in DoD funding applications, a trend we’re expecting to gain momentum, we’ve drafted a policy specific to DoD-supported research. Please note these policy requirements are in addition to all the […]