• Skip to main content
  • Skip to main content
Choose which site to search.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Logo University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Research and Innovation: Institutional Review Board
  • UAMS Health
  • Jobs
  • Giving
  • About
    • Compliance Statement
    • Full Board Meetings
      • Committee Rosters
    • Institutional Review Board Blogs
    • Institutional Review Board Staff
    • Join the UAMS Institutional Review Board
    • Review Fees
  • CLARA
    • Access the System
    • Request a Human Subjects Research Determination
    • Start a Study
  • Templates, Training and Tools
    • Consent for Non-English Speakers
    • Events and Deviations Tables
    • Expanded Access Programs: Compassionate Use & Emergency Use
    • Human Subject Protection Training Instructions
  • Reporting to the Institutional Review Board
  • Expanded Access
  • Institutional Review Board Policies
    • Current Institutional Review Board Policies
      • 1 Principles and Authority
      • 2 Relationships
      • 3 Committee Membership
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations
      • 5 Records (Retired)
      • 6 Documentation
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review
      • 8 Change in Protocol
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations (retired)
      • 12 Quality Assurances
      • 13 Confidentiality
      • 14 Recruitment Practices
      • 15 Consent
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis (moved)
      • 17 Special Populations
      • 18 Drugs and Devices
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions and Complaints
    • Institutional Review Board Policy Archives
      • 1 Principles and Authority Archive
      • 2 Relationships Archive
      • 3 Committee Membership Archive
      • 4 Institutional Review Board Operations Archive
      • 5 Records Archive
      • 6 Documentation Archive
      • 7 Procedures for Study Review Archive
      • 8 Change in Protocol Archive
      • 9 Institutional Review Board Decisions Archive
      • 10 Principal Investigator Responsibilities Archive
      • 11 Appeals and Reconsiderations Archive
      • 12 Quality Assurances Archive
      • 13 Confidentiality Archive
      • 14 Recruitment Practices Archive
      • 15 Consent Archive
      • 16 Risk / Benefit Analysis Archive
      • 17 Special Populations Archive
      • 18 Drugs and Devices Archive
      • 19 Human Genetics Guidance Archive
      • 20 Questions, Concerns, Suggestions, Complaints Archive
  • Research Resources
    • Acronyms and Resources
    • FAQs
      • CITI Program FAQs
      • CLARA FAQs
      • Does my project need IRB review?
      • Prereview and Review Process FAQs
      • Reporting FAQs
      • Submission FAQs
    • Single / Central Institutional Review Board Review
  • Human Research Protection Program Plan
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
  2. Research and Innovation
  3. Institutional Review Board
  4. Blog
  5. Institutional Review Board Members
  6. Page 35

Institutional Review Board Members

Reminders for our Institutional Review Board reviewers about policies, using Clinical Research Administration (CLARA), and other news. Feel free to click on this blog even if you aren’t on the Institutional Review Board. You may get some pointers about what the Institutional Review Board is looking for when it reviews your studies.

What do IRB members need to know about study design?

The Journal of Medical Ethics blog has a recent entry addressing findings of a study that examined the extent to which IRB members were familiar with some basic study design concepts. (In summary: not very familiar.) The blog entry author writes that she would expect IRB members to know enough about research design to be […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

PRIM&R director comments about new Common Rule’s informed consent requirements

It seems as though everyone involved in human subject protections struggles with the informed consent process. The desire to provide complete information to subjects can collide with a need to keep informed consent forms and processes simple and understandable. Eliza Hurley, director of the research professional organization Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R), recently […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Soldiers, animals, and research

This Memorial Day weekend, we honoring those who served. And since this is a research blog, we’ll guide you to a Foundation for Biomedical Research article about the animals who have served our veterans on the battlefield and in the research lab. There’s no shortage of stories about the ties between military working dogs and […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

The verbal brawling over low-risk research under the new Common Rule begins

One goal for the revised Common Rule, according to its developers, was to streamline oversight requirements based on the risk level of proposed research. IRB oversight has caused its share of grousing among researchers here and elsewhere about overreach (a.k.a. mission creep) and focus on irrelevant details. Social and behavioral researchers are now weighing in in […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

A peek into serving as a central IRB

As the research world keeps evolving, the IRB will adapt along with it. One looming change is the increasing use of single-IRB review of multisite studies. In fact, the UAMS IRB will serve as the central IRB for a 17-site pediatric clinical trial network (ISPCTN). While the official start date for the new study is not […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Certificates of Confidentiality are slated to become much easier to obtain

Certificates of Confidentiality can provide important legal protections to researchers who work in potentially sensitive areas. These certificates allow research teams to decline to provide sensitive information in response to certain legal requests, such as subpoenas. The process for obtaining a certificate of confidentiality involves submitting an application to the federal government. However, NIH recently […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Research toolkits, free for the taking (or for the clicking, more precisely)

We like to share resources that might be helpful to researchers whenever we find them. A recent find comes courtesy of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials center at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard (look under “resources). This group has done some work on, among many other things, the return of research results to participants. Transparency […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

The value of research from the subjects’ perspective — the survivors

While the pundits argue whether scientific research results are meaningful, other people are demonstrating the value of biomedical research in their own lives. Chronic myeloid leukemia used to have a fairly grim prognosis, but the early trials of the drug that became Gleevec showed that more favorable outcomes were possible. STAT recently published a roundup of […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

Is much biomedical research nothing more than bad science?

A science reporter for National Public Radio weighs in on the quality of biomedical research in a new book out this month. The title of Richard Harris’ book, “Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hopes, and Wastes Billions,” does little to instill confidence in those of us who make our careers in, […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

A couple of hints when reviewing new submissions

Hint No. 1 – We sometimes see mention of a missing NCT number when reviewing a new submission. Please note that sometimes PIs won’t have received an NCT number from clinicaltrials.gov before the study comes to the IRB for review and approval. Therefore, any IRB request to obtain and document the NCT number should be […]

Filed Under: Institutional Review Board Members

  • «Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 50
  • Next Page»
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences LogoUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Mailing Address: 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205
Phone: (501) 686-7000
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Notices

© 2026 University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences